The shuttles are now historic artifacts, and it’s a funeral

April 29, 2012

This article by Judi McLeod about the New York flyby of the Shuttle Test Article Enterprise compares the Washington overflight of Discovery and the New York overflight to a state funeral. I remember the funeral of John F. Kennedy, and that event and the shuttle flights are both events that are very much misunderstood by the American public.

In November 1963, the shock of a Presidential¬†assassination so overwhelmed the country that decades later Kennedy still had a near-mythic status. It wasn’t until about ten years ago or so that I heard some political pundits dare to say that, had Kennedy served out his first term, so many poor decisions would have come home to roost that he probably wouldn’t have even been elected a second time. This is probably part of what fueled the conspiracy fire that Lyndon Johnson was a part of the assassination plot – he knew JFK would have probably lost the Democrats the White House in 1964. (He probably did in 1960; except for the grace of the first Mayor Daley and his army of fictional voters.)

That may or may not be true; I doubt we will ever know in any of our lifetimes. Too many records have been sealed for too long and are not set to be released for decades yet.

Still, I remember seeing the funeral on television. No matter what your political stripe, it was a sobering thing for America.

The overflights of the shuttles should be thought of as a funeral procession as well, argues Ms. McLeod, and to a degree I agree with her. If we had a strong follow-on human spaceflight program going on, the retirement of the shuttles would be a celebration of American technological prowess. We have no such program. The meager amount of money NASA can dole out and the books of restrictions on private spaceflight companies stifle the development of the kinds of vehicles we can build with today’s technology. We are force to launch super-Apollo capsules on the cheap, maybe two years or more from now. Until then, we ride Russian 1960s-technology spacecraft.

That should never have been allowed to occur. I blame the Clinton, Bush 43 and Obama administrations. Nobody was willing to come out in favor of bold new space exploration initiatives. For that matter, Congress has generally only been interested in NASA as a jobs program for certain Congressional districts. (Otherwise, why would NASA put its major facility in Houston, Texas? Thanks, LBJ.) Other than Dana Rohrabacher, congressman from California, I can’t think of a single congresscritter who has consistently supported the space program.

So for all of you celebrating the overflights of Discovery and Enterprise – look, they are now going into museums. Once, we flew these wonderful machines into space. Now, we beg for rides with the Russians. And didn’t we say the Russians were the ones on the ropes?

Elon Musk, many of us are depending on you…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: