One question I had about the reactors has been answered

March 20, 2011

There’s a lot we don’t know about the situation with the Fukushima reactors, but one nagging question I had was: why did they put spent fuel rod storage on top of the reactor buildings?

Well, here’s the answer:

You can click on this image for a larger version

This is a schematic of a typical GE Mark 1 BWR (boiling water reactor). That’s what they have there. As you can see, the fuel rods would be removed through the top of the steel containment vessel using a crane built into the building. It’s just easier to place them in a pool built right into the building, built of concrete. They are moved a minimum distance and because they are still, in effect, in the secondary containment, there is a greater degree of protection than there might be in a separate installation.

cutaway of the building (click to make larger)

Here you can see a little more detail of the refueling area on the top of the building. I read someplace, in someone’s comment, that buildings where explosives are handled are often built like this one – steel girders and relatively light roof and wall structures. In the case of an explosion the light parts of the structure blow out and the supports remain. I can’t cite that, however.

Spent fuel storage

Here you can see how these pools are set up. They are apparently not covered in any way, to allow gases to escape. If the rods are kept in place and cool, they should be fine. When the cooling fails, or the water drains, there are problems…as we see today.

But you can see that this is in no way connected to the reactor pressure vessel itself. That’s important to remember. There are good reasons to be concerned about releases of radioactive materials, but not so much about a “meltdown.”

Still, with six reactors in one facility and so much damage, the folks there have their hands full, and it’s going to be very, very difficult to get this cleaned up.

Just remember – an earthquake seven times greater than expected, a mammoth tsunami, total loss of power, and so far, no reactors have melted down. To me, that’s a pretty safe design – especially for having been designed in the mid-1960s and run for forty years.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: