Avatar musings

December 26, 2009

I got to see it the other day, on a great Sony digital Muvico screen in Rosemont, Il. In 3D, no less. I’m not a fan of 3D, but there have been some great advances. The 3D stuff I had seen before was at Disney World, like the Mission to Mars ride. This one didn’t even give me much of a headache.

Actually, I agreed a lot with John Scalzi’s comments – and we don’t always agree on things. Cameron did something here that science fiction producers will find their films compared to for years – and probably they will find their own films lacking.

Here are my issues with the film, though. (Spoilers Ahoy!) I know that Cameron was telling a story that’s been repeated over and over on Earth over the last 500 years. But it’s not just “ignorant savages” that get nailed. It’s not that far from taking private property from an individual and trying to use the eminent domain defense to build something that will bring in more tax money. But whether we are talking about the Native Americans (oops – Obama calls them “First Americans”) or the Kelo Supreme Court decision, it’s the same thing. Those with power often will feel they can use it to their own benefit, and should, because their needs or wants are more important than those of others, who they feel as being weaker. Rush Limbaugh says ours is a world governed by the aggressive use of force. Other worlds are not going to be any different, says Cameron. It it Big Business? Is it Big Business in league with Big Government? Who cares? It’s still an assault on liberty, right?

And the Na’vi have to defend themselves. How do they do it? Physically, with weapons. Their weapons are animals and bow and arrows, while the other side has assault helicopters and mecha suits, but they win anyway. The very planet helps defend itself. That’s a bit  of a tree-hugger theme, on the surface, but the plot lays out that there is a sort of neural network in the vegetation, so it’s more science fiction than eco-fiction in my view. It’s not volcanoes or weather that do in the attackers, it’s the plants and animals, so it smacks less of Gaia and more of Simak‘s All Flesh Is Grass.

I’ve had kind of libertarian template in my head lately, so I happen to look at this film as another demonstration of why an armed populace will not be dominated. I doubt that’s what the Hollywoodies are thinking, and I even doubt that’s what Cameron was thinking, but it’s still true. Don’t want your property to be taken away? Be prepared to defend it!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: